This post comes from a Rose City Bluff Restoration volunteer, Stephen Cummings, a senior majoring in Environmental Science at Loyola Marymount University:
One thing we talk about in some of my classes regarding restoration is something you might have heard of before or at least know the concept of – Shifting Baseline Syndrome. Essentially the idea is that we saw things when we were younger as being better than they actually were. When thinking about the restoration of spaces, it’s important to keep this idea in mind and aim to restore an area to its first known state (the original as best we know it), not to the way you remember it or want it to return to. Say in some future scenario there’s someone who always enjoyed picking blackberries along the Bluff and now sees only sparse shrubs and trees. They may think that they need to “restore” the Bluff back to having an abundance of blackberry plants, in the process destroying native habitat. However, the Bluff is not trying to return to how it was when the old speedway was there, or the way it was in any of the years in between, but back to the way it was when the area was pristine and unsettled.
While it’s really not something that RCBR must worry about, as the current goals are to reintroduce native species that were likely present before the settling of Portland, it is still perhaps important in letting people know what we are trying to do. While I’m sure many people in the community are aware of the final goals of the project, there could be those confused as to why we would remove seemingly luscious patches of blackberry in exchange for what might appear to be more desolate areas, or areas with much smaller plants. And while a lot of that is also just about patience, Shifting Baseline Syndrome can be a good term that lets people know it wasn’t always best when you were younger. Which, again, tends to lead to an acceptance of degraded areas as the baseline, leading to even further degradation or subpar restoration.
One more example of Shifting Baseline Syndrome comes from fisheries and fish counts. When fish populations began to decline, fishers stepped in to try and restore the levels to what they saw as normal. But when they started trying to restore fish counts, they went off the levels the fishers saw when they were younger as healthy. Even though these levels were already lower than a true healthy ecosystem before any fishing. As a result, populations continued to decline as the levels never actually returned to their healthy state. Despite the efforts made by the fishers, they no longer knew what healthy or pristine looked like at that point.
So, I guess for the Bluff and community as a whole, accomplishing the mission of restoring the Bluff to its pristine state is of importance for many reasons. One is that the longer it remains degraded, the easier it is for people to forget what it should look like, and the harder it will be for proper restoration to occur. If we can restore the Bluff, it will reset the baseline, and with good records, information, and education, the Bluff could stay healthy for a very long time. Shifting Baseline Syndrome just emphasizes that restoration, and good restoration, can really just be a race against the generations. I think that’s what makes projects like RCBR cool, is that everyone probably sees the state of the Bluff in a different way right now.

c. mid-1910s














